04 Services
Workflow automation consulting A written read before any build.
You describe where the work is stuck. I reply with a written take: the bottleneck, whether automation pays, and a first step. Direct access to the founder. No queue. No package off a menu.
Problem
Teams buy the bot before they name the bottleneck.
Automation vendors sell a stack. Founders need a decision. If the painful work is a messy process, a missing owner, or a tool nobody was trained on, a chatbot will not save it. It will hide it.
An audit is the honest product when you are not sure. It is not a discovery workshop that turns into a 40-page deck. It is a written read from the person who would also do the build.
Sometimes the first step is a small agent. Sometimes it is a calendar rule, a form, or wait. I will say not yet when that is the honest answer. Always open. No build slot required.
- Pressure to 'add AI' without a job to be done
- Three tools already overlapping, and a fourth on a demo call
- A previous chatbot that staff quietly turned off
- No shared picture of where time actually goes
Who
Who this is for.
Founders who need a written decision before a build budget — including when the answer is not yet.
-
01
Pressure to add AI
Someone asked for a chatbot. Nobody named the job. You want a read, not a demo.
-
02
Tools already overlapping
Three products cover the same loop. A fourth is on a demo call. The question is which loop to keep.
-
03
A bot nobody uses
A previous widget got turned off. Before the next one, you want the bottleneck on paper.
-
04
Always open
No build slot required. Consulting is the product when you are not sure. The form is the start.
Examples
What this looks like in practice.
The deliverable is a written take. Sometimes that take is wait, a form, or a hire — not an agent.
-
Automate this, wait on that
The inbox is ready. The CRM is not. The note says which loop to build and which cleanup to do first.
-
A named expensive loop
Not a vibe. Hours, missed calls, or reputation — mapped to the tools you already run.
-
A different first step
A calendar rule, a form, or a person in the seat. If a chatbot would hide the mess, the note says so.
-
A scoped yes
When it is worth building, you get the tier, the fallback, and a first step. Then you decide.
Process
How the work runs.
The form is the start of the audit. You are not buying a build when you send it.
-
01
You write the friction
Name, work email, company size, and where the work is stuck. Specifics beat slogans.
-
02
I read the stack
What you already run, where the data lives, and which loop actually costs money or reputation.
-
03
You get a written take
The bottleneck, whether it is worth automating, and a first step. That reply is the audit.
-
04
You decide
Build with me, pause, or do the first step yourselves. No retainer unless you want one after a launch.
Integrations
Wired to what you already run.
We plug in. The workflow does not wait on a new stack.
- HubSpot
- Shopify
- Stripe
- QuickBooks
- Google Sheets
- Calendars
Outcomes
What changes when it ships.
-
01
A named bottleneck
Not a vibe. The loop that is actually expensive.
-
02
A yes, a not yet, or a different first step
You are not left with a generic 'explore AI' slide.
-
03
Scope you can show a partner
If you do build, the work is already bounded.
-
04
No queue, no account manager
I scope it. If we ship later, I ship it.
Studio
Other ways we can help.
Enquire
Tell us where the friction is.
Write where the work is stuck. I read it and reply. No build commitment.