07 Services

Multi-agent workflows that split the job instead of stretching the prompt.

Several specialized agents on one process. Each job is named. Handoffs are rules. A person approves before anything sends. Harder to keep reliable than a single agent. That is why we take it one process at a time.

Request a multi-agent audit See the studio

Problem

One agent cannot own a process that already has handoffs.

Most teams do not have a multi-agent problem. They have a process that already passes through three desks: research, draft, check, send. Putting that whole chain in one prompt does not make it a system. It makes a longer guess.

A single agent is the right build when the job is one loop: answer from documents, draft the email, extract the invoice. The moment the work is several jobs that can disagree, one model starts dropping a step or inventing a check it did not run.

The useful version is narrower: name each job, give each agent only that job, hand off with a rule, and keep a person on the last gate. If that sounds heavier than a chatbot, it is. That is the point.

  • A process with three or more manual handoffs that one bot was asked to swallow
  • Drafts that skip the policy check because the same prompt also had to write
  • Research that looks done until someone notices the source was not verified
  • No record of which step failed when the output is wrong

Who

Who this is for.

Teams whose process already has specialists — not a shop that needs a wider chatbot.

  • 01

    A chain, not a ticket

    Research, draft, check, send already live as separate desks. Collapsing them into one prompt is how the check disappears.

  • 02

    The single bot hit a wall

    The first automation works. The next step needs a different job, a different source, or a different standard. That is a second agent, or it is a person.

  • 03

    Specialization actually matters

    One person researches. Another writes. A third checks price and policy. Those are not the same prompt with extra instructions.

  • 04

    A human still signs

    You will take a draft that waits for approval. You will not take a process that sends because the model felt done.

Examples

What this looks like in practice.

Named jobs. Named handoffs. A person on the last gate.

  • Lead research into a proposal

    One agent gathers the account from the CRM and public sources. A second drafts. A third checks price and policy. Nothing sends until a person says yes.

  • Ticket to a drafted resolution

    Triage names the type. A specialist agent drafts from the right SOP. A checker flags what the SOP does not cover. A person posts the reply.

  • Inbox that must not skip compliance

    A drafter writes from the thread. A checker reads only the rules. Disagreement is a handoff, not a merge the model performs in private.

  • Ops pack across several tools

    Extract from the PDF, fill the sheet, draft the customer note. Each step is a job with its own source. Failure at one step stops the chain.

Process

How the work runs.

Nothing starts as a swarm. We name the jobs first. Then the handoffs. Then a person on the gate.

  1. 01

    Name each job

    What each agent is allowed to do, what it must not do, and where a person stays in the chain. If that is fuzzy, it is not a multi-agent build yet.

  2. 02

    Write the handoffs

    What gets passed, what counts as done, and what happens when two agents disagree. Disagreement is a designed path, not a surprise.

  3. 03

    Wire the sources

    CRM, docs, Slack, email — each agent sees only what its job needs. Test the ugly cases: missing data, a failed step, a checker that rejects the draft.

  4. 04

    Launch with a checkpoint

    One process, watched. The last step waits for a person until the misses are boring. Optional retainer after that. No lock-in.

Integrations

Wired to what you already run.

We plug in. The workflow does not wait on a new stack.

  • HubSpot
  • Gmail / Outlook
  • Google Docs
  • Slack
  • Google Sheets
  • PDFs
  • Helpdesk
  • Web chat

Outcomes

What changes when it ships.

  • 01

    Each job has an owner

    Research does not also write. The check is not a sentence the drafter added at the end.

  • 02

    Handoffs you can see

    When the output is wrong, you can name the step. That is how you fix it.

  • 03

    A person still approves

    The chain stops at a gate you chose. Sending is not the model’s decision.

  • 04

    Heavier than one agent, on purpose

    If a single loop would do, that is the build. This exists for the processes that already had specialists.

Studio

Other ways we can help.

Enquire

Tell us where the friction is.

Write where the work is stuck. I read it and reply. No build commitment.

Request

Request a workflow audit

I reply to every inquiry within 24 hours.

You get a written read on the bottleneck, whether it is worth automating, and a first step.

I reply from contact@forgentstudio.com

WhatsApp